论文部分内容阅读
与国内众多柴油机及相关零部件企业对国Ⅳ实施存在问题的看法相同,亚新科工业技术有限公司(以下简称亚新科)全球销售与市场部高级市场经理袁学辉认为:“行业人士都在困惑国Ⅳ执行的严格程度。由于对此的不确定,国内不少发动机厂家都同时采用EGR和SCR两种技术路线。虽然SCR路线比EGR路线有更多优势,但是由于有前车之鉴,国内主流柴油机厂只得做两手准备,这就导致各家产品开发周期长、投入的成本大,从而造成企业资源的浪费。”
With many domestic diesel engine and related parts and components of the country IV implementation of the existing problems of view the same, ASIMCO Technologies Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to ASIMCO) global sales and marketing department senior market manager Yuan Xuehui that: “Industry people are confused countries Ⅳ implementation of the strict degree.Because of this uncertainty, many domestic engine manufacturers are using both EGR and SCR two technical routes.Although the SCR route has more advantages than the EGR route, but because of a warning, the domestic mainstream Diesel Engine Factory had only Doing both preparations, which led to a long product development cycle, the cost of investment, resulting in a waste of business resources. ”