论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较药物、无痛及传统三种人流方式在终止早孕中的应用价值。方法:随机选取我院2016年1月至2016年12月99例意外妊娠女性为本次实验研究对象,按照终止妊娠方式不同将所有所有患者分为A、B、C三组,其中A组33例女性采用药物人流方式终止早孕,B组33例女性采用无痛人流的方式终止早孕,C组33例女性采用传统人流方式终止早孕,比较三组患者临床治疗效果。结果:A组有25例患者完全流产,B组有32例患者完全流产,C组有29例患者完全流产,三组数据具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:无痛人流完全流产率高于药物流产、传统人流,且无痛人流患者流产腹痛程度明显低于药物流产、传统人流。
Objective: To compare the value of drug, painless and traditional three kinds of abortion in terminating early pregnancy. Methods: A total of 99 unwanted pregnancies in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2016 were randomly selected. All patients were divided into A, B and C groups according to the way of termination of pregnancy. A group of 33 Cases of women using drug abortion termination of early pregnancy, B group of 33 women with painless termination of early pregnancy, C group 33 women terminated by traditional means of pregnancy flow, the clinical efficacy of the three groups were compared. Results: Twenty-five patients in group A were completely aborted, 32 patients in group B were completely aborted, and 29 patients in group C were completely aborted. The data of three groups were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The rate of complete abortion of painless abortion is higher than that of medical abortion and traditional abortion. Abdominal pain of abortion is obviously lower than that of medical abortion and traditional abortion.