论文部分内容阅读
电话业务是否具有垄断性,一直是个有争议的问题。现有的经营规模本身也意味着政策限制了新的运营者的介入。对于新的运营者来说,要想在不增加线路投资的情况下实现互连互通,比较理想的作法是任其自由发展,即要么通过市场调节,要么通过较高的网络处置费用来实现。 反对以自由竞争的方式参与经营的观点,势必会减少有不同需求和有优先权的现有用户的数量,而广大用户对电话业务的不同需求也需有大量的相互竞争的供应者。即使是常规的电话服务(POTS),也必须有一定的安装速度和一定性
Whether the phone business is monopolistic has always been a controversial issue. The existing scale of operation also means that the policy limits the involvement of new operators. For new operators, the ideal way to achieve interconnection without increasing line investment is to let them freely develop, either through market regulation or through higher network disposal costs. Opposing the idea of participating in business in a free and competitive manner will inevitably reduce the number of existing users with different needs and priorities and the vast number of subscribers to the different needs of the telephony business will also require a large number of competing suppliers. Even regular telephone service (POTS) must have a certain installation speed and certainty