论文部分内容阅读
Hauser et al.(2002)提出语言的“生物普遍性”掀起了从生物学角度探讨语言进化的热潮,但关于形态进化的论著却很少。Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy所著《形态的进化》填补了这方面的空白。Carstairs-McCarthy主要在词和范式(word and paradigm)框架下研究屈折形态,在形态模块地位问题上,他与生成语法形态学的主流,即句法学派和分布形态学的观点对立,主张形态是区别于句法的独立模块,反对将形态“归并”为句法。《形态的进化》告诉我们,Carstairs-
Hauser et al. (2002) put forward the language “biological universality ” set off from the biological point of view of the evolution of language boom, but on the morphological evolution of the works are few. Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy’s “Evolution of Morphology” fills this gap. Carstairs-McCarthy studied inflection patterns mainly in the framework of the word and paradigm. On the status of the morphological modules, Carstairs-McCarthy contradicts the viewpoints of generating the mainstream of grammatical morphology, that of the syntax and distributional morphology, and asserting that morphology is the difference In the syntactic stand-alone module, objection will be the form of “merged” as the syntax. Evolutionary Morphology tells us that Carstairs-