论文部分内容阅读
杨伯峻先生的《春秋左传注》为《左传》学的集大成之作,是学界公认的《左传》最佳注本。但智者千虑,或有一失,该书中仍有一些可商可补之处。近年来,赵生群、陈恩林、徐朝晖、萧旭等诸位先生陆续发表了一些商榷文章~①,颇多精义,实为杨氏谏臣。本文再就笔者读书所见,略陈固陋,供方家批评。一、误释字词杨先生书中对前代《左传》注作了总结、补正,提出了很多新颖的见解,其中多得确诂,但有部分字词的解释似仍有问题。前人商榷之文多集中于此,现笔者再举两例于下:1.《昭公十年》:“秋,七月,平子伐莒,取郠。献俘,始用人于亳社。臧武仲在齐,闻之,曰:‘周公其不飨鲁祭乎?周公飨义,鲁无义。《诗》曰:”德音孔昭,视民不佻。“佻之谓甚矣,而壹用
Mr. Yang Bojun’s Spring and Autumn Annotation of Zuo Zhuan is the masterpiece of the study of Zuo Zhuan, and is the best-known Annotation of Zuo Zhuan recognized by the academic circles. However, if the wise man is anxious or has a mistake, there are still some things that can be done in the book. In recent years, Zhao Shengqun, Chen Enlin, Xu Zhaohui, Xiao Xu and other gentlemen have published some articles of discussion ~ ①, a lot of special meaning, in fact, Yang’s remonstrance minister. This article and then I read the book see, a little rough, for the supplier criticism. First, misunderstood words Mr. Yang in the book on the previous generation, ”Zuo Zhuan“ made a conclusion, correction, put forward many new ideas, many of which are accurate, but there are still some problems in the interpretation of some words. The texts discussed by the previous people are mostly concentrated in this article, and now the author cites two more cases as follows: 1. ”Zhao Gong ten years“: ”In autumn, July, Pingzi cut 莒, take 郠. Zang Wuzhong in Qi, Wen Zhi, said: ’Zhou Gong its implied Lu sacrifice? Zhou Gongyi Yi, Lu nonsense. “Poems” said: “German tone hole Zhao, depending on the people.” "佻 that even carry on, and one use