论文部分内容阅读
《参考文选》1998年第25期刊登王绍光的文章,认为我国不应再提效率优先了。改革初期,我国城乡差距和地域差距可能缩小了,但1985年以后出现了新形势,这时的指导思想在很大程度上叫“效率优先,兼顾公平”,而具体到政策上往往强调的是效率优先。从八十年代一直到九十年代初,很多学者还在讲平均主义太严重了,所以效率不高,要用收入分配多元化、差别化刺激效率。但这种想法到九十年代已经不真实了。九十年代收入差距在扩大。除了扶贫这一块,中国可以说基本上还没有进行再分配的政策机制、政策工具。世界银行1997年发布的一份报告指出,中国80年代初期基尼系数是0.28,到1995年是0.38。按照世界银行的统计,我国的贫富悬殊比发达国家、比东亚其他国家和地区要大。从动态上讲,全世界没
“Reference anthology” published in No. 25 of 1998 Wang Shaoguang’s article, that our country should not mention the efficiency of the priority. In the initial stage of reform, the gap between urban and rural areas in our country may be narrowed, but the new situation has emerged since 1985. At this time, the guiding ideology is largely called “efficiency is prioritized and fairness is taken into account,” while policy-specific emphasis is often Efficiency first. From the 1980s to the early 1990s, many scholars still argue that egalitarianism is too serious. Therefore, it is inefficient, and it is necessary to diversify and differentiate its income to stimulate efficiency. But this idea was unrealistic in the 90s. The income gap in the 1990s is widening. In addition to this piece of poverty alleviation, China can basically say that there are no policy mechanisms and policy tools for redistribution. A 1997 World Bank report states that China’s Gini coefficient was 0.28 in the early 1980s and 0.38 by 1995. According to the statistics of the World Bank, the disparity between the rich and the poor in our country is larger than in developed countries and other countries and regions in East Asia. From a dynamic point of view, the world did not