论文部分内容阅读
在本刊网站(www．cmacjs．com．cn)“外科论坛”栏目,读者对于本刊2006年第5期发表的“微创直接甲状旁腺肿瘤切除术34例临床分析”一文进行了评论。指出了其中的一些编辑瑕疵,同时对该文的学术内容也提出了不同意见。现将读者对该文的点评、质疑和作者的回复一并刊登。我们感谢读者的关注和批评,我们为读者的认真、严谨喝彩!也感谢作者对我们工作的大力支持和配合。我们认为,公开发表的论文就应该接受公开的质疑和批评,对于作者和编者同样如此。我们将努力改进工作,进一步提高编辑质量,同时也希望广大作者在论文撰写中更加严谨。
In the magazine website (www.cmacjs.com.cn), “Surgical Forum” column, the reader for the fifth issue of 2006 issue of “Minimally invasive direct parathyroid tumor resection in 34 cases of clinical analysis” one article was commented. Pointed out some of the editing flaws, and also put forward different opinions on the academic content of the article. Now readers of the article comments, questions and author’s reply published together. We thank readers for their concern and criticism. We are serious and cautious about our readers and thank the authors for their strong support and cooperation in our work. In our opinion, published papers should be openly challenged and criticized, as do authors and editors. We will strive to improve our work to further improve the quality of editorial, but also hope that the majority of authors in the essay writing more rigorous.