论文部分内容阅读
AIM:To select the optimal edge detection methods to identify the corneal surface,and compare three fitting curve equations with Matlab software. METHODS:Fifteen subjects were recruited. The corneal images from optical coherence tomography(OCT)were imported into Matlab software. Five edge detection methods(Canny,Log,Prewitt,Roberts,Sobel)were used to identify the corneal surface. Then two manual identifying methods(ginput and getpts)were applied to identify the edge coordinates respectively. The differences among these methods were compared. Binomial curve(y=Ax~2+Bx+C),Polynomial curve [p(x)=p1x~n+p2x~(n-1)+....+pnx+pn+1] and Conic section(Ax~2+Bxy+Cy~2+Dx+Ey+F=0)were used for curve fitting the corneal surface respectively. The relative merits among three fitting curves were analyzed. Finally,the eccentricity(e)obtained by corneal topography and conic section were compared with paired t-test. RESULTS:Five edge detection algorithms all had continuous coordinates which indicated the edge of the corneal surface. The ordinates of manual identifying were close to the inside of the actual edges. Binomial curve was greatly affected by tilt angle. Polynomial curve was lack of geometrical properties and unstable. Conic section could calculate the tilted symmetry axis,eccentricity,circle center,etc. There were no significant differences between ‘e’ values by corneal topography and conic section(t=0.9143,P=0.3760 >0.05).CONCLUSION:It is feasible to simulate the corneal surface with mathematical curve with Matlab software. Edge detection has better repeatability and higher efficiency. The manual identifying approach is an indispensable complement for detection. Polynomial and conic section are both the alternative methods for corneal curve fitting. Conic curve was the optimal choice based on the specific geometrical properties.
METHODS: Fifteen subjects were recruited. The corneal images from optical coherence tomography (OCT) were imported into Matlab software. Five edge Detection methods (Canny, Log, Prewitt, Roberts, Sobel) were used to identify the corneal surface. Then two manual identifying methods (ginput and getpts) were applied to identify the edge coordinates respectively. (y = Ax ~ 2 + Bx + C), Polynomial curve [p (x) = p1x ~ n + p2x ~ (n-1) + .... + pnx + pn + 1] and Conic section Finally, the eccentricity (e) was obtained by corneal topography and conic section were compared with paired t-test. RESULTS: Five edge detection algorithms all had continuous coordinates which indicates the edge of the corneal surface. The ordinates of manual of were close to the inside of the actual edges. Binomial curve was greatly affected by tilt angle. Polynomial curve was lack of geometrical properties and unstable. Conic section could calculate the tilted symmetry axis, eccentricity, Circle center, etc. There were no significant differences between ’e’ values by corneal topography and conic section (t = 0.9143, P = 0.3760> 0.05) .CONCLUSION: It is feasible to simulate the corneal surface with mathematical curve with Matlab software. Edge detection has better repeatability and higher efficiency. The manual identification approach is an indispensable complement for detection. Polynomial and conic section are both the alternative methods for corneal curve fitting. Conic curve was the optimal choice based on the specific geometrical properties.