论文部分内容阅读
引言如果仅仅从资料方面着眼,近三十余年来从事中国古代思想研究的学者应该说还是相当幸运的。20世纪后半叶,先有70年代长沙马王堆汉墓帛书文献的出土,后有90年代荆门郭店楚墓竹简文献及本世纪初上海博物馆藏战国竹简文献的问世。这两次简帛文献的发表都激起了学界的极大兴奋——不消说,一位后世的学者幸而看到连郑玄或朱子都不曾经目的文献,其惊喜之情应当是不难想见的——进而成为古代思想研究领域中新的学术增长点。尤其是后者,两批竹简中均有大量不见于传世文献的先秦典籍,这为古代学术思
Introduction It is still quite fortunate that scholars engaged in the research of ancient Chinese thought in the recent thirty years or so should have been very fortunate if only from the data perspective. The second half of the 20th century, the first 70 years of Changsha Mawangdui silk tomb unearthed literature, followed by the 90s Jingdian Guodian Chu bamboo slips and early this century Shanghai Museum of War bamboo slips appeared. The publication of both the books of silk and silk both aroused the great excitement of the academic circle. Needless to say, a later scholar was lucky enough to see that even Zheng Xuan or Zhu Zi did not have the objective literature. The surprises should not be hard to imagine - And then become a new academic growth point in the field of ancient thought research. Especially in the latter, there are a large number of pre-Qin classics not found in the handed down literature in two batches of bamboo slips,