论文部分内容阅读
暑热袭来,许多劳动者因对自己的“高温权利”没有概念而吃亏。以下案例,或许能给读者朋友一些提示。高温津贴应当足额发放案例田某是一家公司的外勤员工,即使是在35℃以上的高温天气,也必须照常进行室外露天作业。2014年6月,田某要求公司支付高温津贴。但公司认为,已经按照彼此约定的月工资足额发放,田某无权要求公司另行支付高温津贴。后经劳动争议仲裁委员会仲裁,支持了田某的请求。评析国家安全生产监督管理
As the heat hit, many workers suffered a lack of notion of their “right to high temperature.” The following case, may give readers a few tips. High-temperature allowance should be paid in full cases Tianmou is a company's field staff, even in the hot weather above 35 ℃, but also must be open to outdoor work outdoors. In June 2014, Tianmou asked the company to pay the high-temperature allowance. However, the company believes that according to the mutual agreement of the monthly salary paid in full, Tianmou no right to require companies to pay high-temperature allowance. After arbitration by the Labor Dispute Arbitration Commission, Tian's request was supported. Comment on State Safety Production Supervision and Management