论文部分内容阅读
“立案不实”的弊端已成为各级公安机关的共识,但目前基层派出所和刑侦部门在如实立案问题上已处于两难境地。究其原因,一是一些上级部门曾不客观地强调发案率、破案率,实际上,发案愈来愈多,破案素质提不上去,破案难度也相应在增加,而发案多少正是衡量治安工作优劣和治安形势好坏的重要标准,所以,基层公安部门只有将一些破不了的案件或一些够立案标准,但又无力顾及的小案件,隐瞒起来,不予立案;二是上级虽要求基层发案实报实立,但迟迟没有强硬的措施,触动不了基层发一起立一起的决心;三是社会各界往往把治安状况不佳、犯罪增多说成是公安机关没有做好工作,基层公安机关也只好避讳一些案件,不予立案。如此一来,导致立案数据资料的不实,进而不能正确评估社会治安状况,影响了对犯罪规律的正确分析,使上级决策的科学性和针对性发生偏差,同时也埋没了基层公安机关的实际工作量。公安干警出了很多现场,牺牲不少休息时间,花费了一定的财力物力,因不予立案,不仅反映不出干警超负荷的辛苦程度,而且也免不了造成一些同志的误解。可以想象,一个县局每年平均每个干警只办3起案件的面上数字很难
The malpractice of “filing a false case” has become the consensus of public security organs at all levels. However, at present, grassroots police stations and criminal investigation departments have been in a dilemma in truthfully filing the case. The reason is that some superior departments did not objectively emphasize the incidence of crime and the rate of detection of crimes. In fact, more and more crimes have been committed, and the quality of solving crimes has not been raised. The difficulty of solving crimes has correspondingly increased, Measure the pros and cons of public security work and the important standard of good and bad of public security situation, so the grass-roots public security departments will only some of the cases can not be broken or some filing standards, but unable to take care of the small cases, concealed, not the case; Although grass-roots units are required to report facts and facts in real cases, they have not taken firm measures to trigger the determination of grass-roots units to establish a common ground. Third, the public often regards the law and order situation as an unsatisfactory situation and the increase in crimes as saying that the public security organs are not doing a good job Public security organs at the grass-roots level had no choice but to taboo some cases and not file a case. As a result, the data on filing the case is not accurate, and the state of public security can not be properly assessed, which affects the correct analysis of the law of criminality and makes the scientific and targeted deviation of the higher-level decision-making undermines the reality of grassroots public security organs Workload. Public security officers and men out of a lot of the scene, sacrificed a lot of rest time, spent a lot of financial and material resources, because not filing, not only failed to reflect the hard-working police overload, but also inevitably lead to some comrades misunderstanding. It is conceivable that it is very difficult for a county bureau to average only three cases per police officer each year