论文部分内容阅读
思想史研究已经成为热门学科,但是,它在学科建设上目前还是显得“杂乱无章”。围绕中国近现代思想史学科的主体性和独立性确立的焦点、难点和重点,本文指出目前中国近现代思想史研究存在着研究对象、范围和方法的分歧,而且无限“扩张”领地的做法使得思想史研究更加尴尬,当下思想史研究者的当务之急不是扩张(谱系),而是收缩(编制)。批判性、吊诡性和当代性构成了思想史的“个性”,无论是内涵还是外延的圈定,都应该遵循这一学科应有的规律。
The study of history of ideas has become a hot subject, however, it still appears to be “disorganized” in discipline construction. Focusing on the focal points, difficulties and priorities of the subjectivity and independence of the discipline of Chinese modern and contemporary history, this paper points out that there are differences in the research objects, scope and methods in the study of Chinese modern and contemporary history of ideas. Moreover, the unlimited expansion of the territory makes The study of the history of ideas is even more embarrassing. The immediate priority of researchers in the history of ideas is not expansion (pedigree) but contraction (compilation). Criticism, paradoxicality and contemporaryity constitute the “personality” of the history of ideas. Both the connotation and the delineation of epitaxy should follow the law of this discipline.