论文部分内容阅读
现行《公司法》第十六条对公司担保行为作出了限制性规定,公司为他人提供担保的,应当依据相关规定经股东(大)会或董事会决议。而对违背此规则实施的担保行为的效力问题,立法并没有明确规定。本文以违规担保行为的类型为出发点,分析公司违规担保的实质,并从公司意思形成与意思表示分离为视角探讨公司违规担保的效力,以寻求解释该问题的最佳路径。
The existing “Company Law” Article XVI of the company guarantees made restrictive behavior, the company provides guarantees for others, according to the relevant provisions of the shareholders (big) or the Board of Directors resolution. However, the legislation does not clearly stipulate the effectiveness of the guarantee in violation of this rule. Based on the type of noncompliance guarantee, this article analyzes the essence of noncompliance guarantee, and explores the effectiveness of corporate noncompliance guarantee from the perspective of the separation between the formation of company meaning and the expression of meaning, so as to seek the best way to explain the problem.