论文部分内容阅读
本文追溯厘清中国20世纪“通俗文学”和“纯文学”两个概念的生成、分歧及其背后隐含的文学议题。主要论点是:就中国“通俗文学”和“纯文学”两者割离分歧的起点,一般咸被指认为五四时期的新文化运动,但事实上更可追溯至晚清梁启超等人的“新小说”理念。“雅”、“俗”两者之间的分歧到1920年后成为普遍接受的论述,其政治倾向压倒美学意义,对后来的中国现代文学的发展造成了相当大的影响。文学创作的政治倾向不但削减了现代文学的主体性,也反映出菁英群体对民间文艺的警觉和掌控文化生产的企图。总结以上观察与检视,本文将清末民初此种就“雅”、“俗”文学的隔离命名为“大分歧”。
This essay traces back to the formation and divergence of the two concepts of “popular literature” and “pure literature” in the 20th century in China and the underlying literary issues behind them. The main argument is that beginning with the departure of both China’s “popular literature” and “pure literature”, the general salty was generally designated as the New Culture Movement in the May 4th Movement, but in fact it can be traced back to the late Qing Liang Kai-chao- Etc. “New Novel ” concept. The disagreements between “elegant” and “vulgar” became common accepted after 1920, whose political tendency overwhelmed the aesthetic meaning and caused a considerable impact on the development of modern Chinese literature later. The political orientation of literary creation not only reduces the subjectivity of modern literature, but also reflects the alertness of the elite groups to the folk literature and the attempts to control cultural production. To sum up the above observations and examinations, this article will be “late Qing” early this “”, “vulgar ” the isolation of the literature named “big differences ”.