论文部分内容阅读
张雷先生在《公关世界》95年第2期上撰文,提出了一个观点——“内部公关”不应属于公共关系学研究的对象。其理由之一是“这是一个逻辑悖论”,即员工不能既是公关的主体,又是公关的客体。王安军先生又在《公关世界》95年第12期上撰文,认为这不是逻辑悖论。其理由之一是“一个集合概念是完全可能既是某行为的主体,又是该行为的客体”的。笔者不打算对双方的争论焦点(“内部公关”是否属于公共关系学的研究对象)加以评论,只想从逻辑学的角度对王文的论据略陈管见。
Mr. Zhang Lei wrote an article in the second issue of “World of Public Relations” in 1995, proposing a point that “internal public relations” should not belong to the study of public relations. One of the reasons is that “this is a logical paradox”, that is, employees can not be both PR subjects and PR subjects. Mr. Wang Anjun again in the “PR World” in 1995 on the 12th article, that this is not a logical paradox. One of the reasons is that “a set concept is entirely possible to be both the subject of an act and the object of the act”. I do not intend to comment on the arguments of both parties (whether PR is the research object of PR), just want to make some mistakes about WANG’s arguments from the perspective of logic.