既往放疗对二线及以上应用PD-1治疗Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌疗效和不良反应影响

来源 :中华放射肿瘤学杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:a306783805
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:对晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)应用免疫检查点抑制剂PD-1前是否放疗进行总结,阐明放疗对PD-1应用的疗效及肺不良反应。方法:回顾性分析2015—2019年间河南省肿瘤医院接受免疫治疗的Ⅳ期NSCLC患者资料,收集患者基本信息、放疗及免疫治疗情况以及肺部不良反应情况。根据PD-1抑制剂应用前是否接受放疗分为既往放疗组和未放疗组,应用n Kaplan-n Meier法生存分析。n 结果:共纳入患者90例,其中既往放疗组39例,未放疗组51例。中位随访时间22.9个月,既往放疗组与未放疗组中位无进展生存期为7.5个月(95%n CI为5.4~9.5个月)与4.1个月(95%n CI为3.1~5.1个月)(n P=0.003),中位总生存期为15.2个月(95%n CI为12.3~18.1个月)与9.3个月(95%n CI为6.1~12.5个月(n P=0.040)。肺不良反应两组相近(n P=0.154)。n 结论:Ⅳ期NSCLC患者中PD-1抑制剂治疗前接受放疗患者无进展生存及总生存较未行放疗患者明显获益,肺不良反应亦未增加,但还需进一步扩大样本研究。“,”Objective:To investigate whether radiotherapy should be delivered before the application of immune checkpoint inhibitor PD-1 in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and evaluate the effect of previous radiotherapy on the efficacy and pulmonary toxicity of PD-1 inhibitor.Methods:Clinical data of patients with stage Ⅳ NSCLC who received immunotherapy in Henan Cancer Hospital from March 2015 to September 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The baseline data of patients, the status of radiotherapy and immunotherapy and the pulmonary toxicity were collected. According to whether radiotherapy was given before PD-1 inhibitor application, all patients were divided into the previous radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy groups. Survival analysis was performed by n Kaplan-n Meier method.n Results:A total of 90 patients were enrolled including 39 cases in the previous radiotherapy group and 51 cases in the non-radiotherapy group. The median follow-up time was 22.9 months. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) in the previous radiotherapy group was 7.5 months (95%n CI 5.4-9.5 months), significantly longer compared with 4.1 months (95%n CI 3.1-5.1 months) in the non-radiotherapy group (n P=0.003). The median overall survival (mOS) significantly differed between two groups[15.2 months (95%n CI 12.3-18.1 months) n vs. 9.3 months (95%n CI 6.1-12.5 months)](n P=0.040). The incidence of pulmonary toxicity showed no significant difference between two groups (n P=0.154).n Conclusions:Patients with stage Ⅳ NSCLC patients in the previous radiotherapy group obtain significantly better mPFS and mOS and similar pulmonary toxicity compared with their counterparts in the non-radiotherapy group. Nevertheless, the findings remain to be validated by subsequent investigations with larger sample size.
其他文献
  太阳能背板位于太阳能电池板的背面,对电池片起保护和支撑作用,具有可靠的绝缘性、阻水性、耐老化性。目前国内外的背板基本都是以聚酯薄膜为基材,以氟材料为表面保护材料的
  Ecosunary(易可森)为非EVA型封装胶膜,与常规EVA胶膜相比,它可有效解决组件的PID、蜗牛纹等问题,并为组件提供更加持久、稳定、可靠的保护.本文介绍了四款Ecosunary(易可
  太阳能发电事业为了在中国不断扩张,面对发电事业的利润最大化不仅减低发电成本是必要的,长寿命和高发电效率也是非常重要的。背板作为保护太阳能电池组件背部的材料,保护太
会议
鸡西矿业集团公司张辰煤矿西三采区3
期刊
  Silicon Products Bitterfeld (SPB) is active in the following fields:Production of silicon for photovoltaic and semi-conductor purposes and related products
会议
  In order to further improve the performance of industrial n-type bifacial solar cells beyond 20%, the importance of the related Diffusion processes are tren
会议
  一、晶硅电池发展及现状(1)从目前已产业化的光伏电池转换效率看,单晶电池尤其是N型路线具备明显的效率优势(2)未来三年内,量产N型单晶和P型单晶电池转换效率分别达到24%、2
  阐述了抗PID EVA、聚烯烃等新型封装材料在组件中的研究进展,探讨这些新型材料的构成及作用机理。对于不同电池及组件的封装方案,对于新型封装材料及封装结构在组件及电站
  光伏组件封框材料跟随组件的发展,经历了硅胶、胶带、丁基热熔胶(带)等形式,本文主要就对不同封框材料进行了对比分析,阐述了不同封框材料的优缺点,重点的介绍了胶带、硅胶在
  以不同视角对多晶光伏组件PID特性进行研究分析,在此基础上提出相应解决方案。