INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND THE NATIONAL CONTEXT:CULTURAL AND INSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS FOR SM

来源 :北京师范大学 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:lisadandan
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  There is widespread knowledge that entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial organizations are among major drivers for sustained economic growth.Literature on entrepreneurship offers a few theoretical perspectives, such as traits-based, institutions-based, resource-based, organizational behavior-based and cross-cultural comparative points of view.First of all is the debate between traits and institutions.The former is mainly focused on the question of what motivates individual entrepreneurs to start new ventures and why many of those individuals break away from large organizations, while the latter is more concerned with how entrepreneurial firms are guided and influenced by the surrounding environment that set formal and informal rules of the game.In the era of economic globalization, international entrepreneurship has gained increasing levels of enthusiasm among scholars, practitioners, and policy makers.The present study takes a comparative approach to the examination of international entrepreneurship with special attention to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) as these organizations play a vital role in many societies (e.g., innovation, revenue contribution, job creation, etc.) but they are also among the most vulnerable in the ever more intertwined and often volatile marketplace.Recognizing many challenges and high failure rates among SMEs, especially being caught in the worldwide economic hard time, many governments and policy makers have included regulatory reforms and small business rescue plans in their economic recovery strategies (World Bank, 2010).The primary purpose of the present study is to explore how SMEs triumph over barriers in the time of dynamic socioeconomic changes so that to develop a contextual framework for weighing strategic options as well as assessing policy implications.Key factors examined include some unique characteristics of SMEs (e.g., entrepreneurship vision, entry niche, resource acquisition, organizational capabilities, and strategic options for going international) and social institutional variables (e.g., culture, government regulations, institutional reforms both at home and abroad), which may assist or hamper an entrepreneurs capability to expand business operations domestically or across borders.Country-firm specific examples are incorporated to illustrate ways to assess and exploit rising opportunities for SMEs and international entrepreneurship.
其他文献
会议
This paper explains why some Chinese high-tech private firms survive and thrive within a system which appears to be arrayed against them.We use the mobile phone handset industry as an illustrative cas
During last few years, Bangladesh Government has taken some worthwhile initiatives in the field of e-governance and it is now being accepted as an effective tool of service delivery within the Governm
Based on an empirical fieldwork study, this paper discusses the contestation between land-lost farmers and local government in the process of urbanisation and land expropriation in China, examining th
会议
Urban renewal is a hot topic in many developed countries or regions.How to redevelop a piece of land with an appropriate use which is compatible with current land utilization in the surrounding area i
Since the 1990s, China has experienced rapid urbanization.The urbanization rate (percentage of the population that is registered as urban residents) in China increased from 28 percent in 1993 to 51 pe
会议
Developing concentrated rural settlement (CRS) is regarded to be more sustainable and resilient in post-disaster reconstruction.Very few studies, however, have been reported until the post 5.12 Sichua
会议
Chinas remarkable economic development has been achieved at the cost of its environment.Scholarly attention on international norm diffusion and policy learning asserts that international influence cou
This study empirically test the impact of E-government on corruption with afive-year panel data set from the UN E-Government Surveys of 2003, 2004, 2005, 2008, and 2010.Despite a long debate regarding