综合志书中“政区”的作用[点评]

来源 :中国地方志协会,中国地方志指导小组 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wenxiaoyao1214
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  本文对贾辉铭的《 综合志书中“政区”的作用》进行了点评,指出该文首先提出地方志中"政区"的作用和位置,然后指出志书中"政区"处置失当的种种表现,最后就如何设置"政区"提出自己的见解。既有理论思考,又有具体事例;既指出存在问题,又提出解决问题的方案。最后针对解决方案进行了完善。
其他文献
This paper is mainly about "performance evaluation of universities and colleges".And all of the data from 2003 to 2009 are taken from the storehouse of Chinese academic literature online publishing ho
The Comprehensive Evaluation of Higher Education Efficiency is of great importance to the development of higher education.Based on mapping concept,this study tries to build a framework including educa
The emerging trend of university patenting and the potential conflict between technological commercialization and scientific publications have raised more concerns.Taking Chinese "985 project" univers
Based on the actual demand of effectively managing and sharing the massive spatial and non-spatial data of digital community,we realized the scalability design of digital community metadata adapter by
We compare the research between China and the top 4 leading countries in an emerging field-nano biomedical science ("NBMS") at the country level.The results show that China grows fast in NBMS accordin
A multi-indicator comprehensive evaluation method for scientific research is proposed.We interpret the process of establishing the evaluation method in detail.We select the SCI Database as the data so
In this paper,we introduce the latest developments of several main world university evaluation systems at home and abroad,analyze the problems of those evaluation systems and discuss the trends of int
Using the Web of Science,this article researched recent developments and changes in the Scientometrics by bibliometrics analysis of articles,proceedings papers,letters and reviews published in the jou
The h-index,g-index and cumulative impact factor of these comprehensive social science journals are calculated by CSSCI over the period 1998-2007.Through the analysis of g-index,we found that g-index
Comparative analysis shows that authors tend to choose broader-term labels when manually reading and analyzing cited references to a cluster,whereas algorithmically chosen terms from citing items tend