论文部分内容阅读
本文在对已有的制度变迁、制度变迁方式理论进行总结的基础上,提出了一个新的分析制度变迁方式的理论,即把制度变迁划分为两种基本的类型:一种是内生规则制度变迁;一种是外生规则制度变迁。并在这一框架内提出了中国和俄罗斯两种新的制度变迁方式模型:中国的改革实质上是内生规则相机抉择制度变迁。俄罗斯的改革,是典型的外生规则强制性制度变迁。由于制度的内生规则本身就是对新制度需求而做的“自适应”调整,因此,内生规则的制度变迁和演化更容易达到或接近制度安排的适应性效率。通过对中俄两国改革战略演变的分析,本文进一步证明中国的制度变迁的效率性,俄罗斯的制度变迁导致经济改革不成功的原因所在。
On the basis of summarizing the existing institutional changes and the theories of institutional changes, this paper proposes a new theory to analyze institutional changes, that is, dividing institutional changes into two basic types: one is the endogenous rules system Change; one is the change of exogenous rules and regulations. In this framework, two new models of institutional change are put forward: China’s reform is essentially the change of the camera choice system of endogenous rules. Russia’s reform is a typical mandatory system of exogenous rules changes. As the endogenous rules of the system itself are “adaptive ” adjustments made to the needs of the new system, institutional changes and evolution of endogenous rules are more likely to meet or approach the adaptive efficiency of institutional arrangements. Through the analysis of the evolution of the strategy of China and Russia, this article further proves the efficiency of the institutional change in China. The reason why the institutional change of Russia led to the unsuccessful economic reform lies in this article.