论文部分内容阅读
在伊朗核问题上,当前一般适用的实在国际法主要有:国际条约(包括《核不扩散条约》、《全面禁止核试验条约》、《部分禁止核试验条约》,以及《限制地下核武器试验条约》);国际习惯;联合国安理会决议;单方法律行为。目前的实在国际法由于在诸多方面存在缺失,因而在调整伊朗核问题时显得力不从心。伊朗在国际条约上仅仅承担了某种纸面上的义务,有关的国际习惯尚未形成,联合国安理会有关决议因受地缘政治因素的影响难有作为,而指望靠单方承诺解决伊朗核问题也是不现实的。当实在国际法不能很好地调整国际关系时,强行法可以被直接适用来弥补这一缺失。
On Iran’s nuclear issue, the current generally applicable real international law mainly includes international treaties (including the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, the Partial Test Ban Treaty and the Treaty on Underground Nuclear Tests. ); International conventions; UN Security Council resolutions; unilateral legal acts. At present, due to the lack of international law in many aspects, the adjustment of the Iranian nuclear issue seems inadequate. Iran has only assumed some paper-based obligations in international treaties. The relevant international conventions have not yet been formed. The UN Security Council resolutions are hard pressed to do anything because of geopolitical factors, and it is also unrealistic to expect unilateral promises to resolve the Iranian nuclear issue of. When it is true that international law can not properly regulate international relations, jus cogens can be directly applied to remedy the deficiency.