论文部分内容阅读
哲学史既为史,便是将它放在了一个时间性的视域里来观看哲学家们的哲学思想的前继后承的历史性的关系.当海德格尔在阐述解析存在论历史的任务时,似乎暗示了一种对待哲学史的态度:按照存在论上的时间性扬其所不弃而抑其所弃.这一态度的一切含义,也就是他在评价康德之对于此在的存在论时所使用“耽搁”一词的意义.本文想借现代西方哲学史上颇有争议的康德之海德格尔式解释作为一个“案例”,就这一具有“解释学的暴力”性质的解释,来讨论一下哲学思想是怎样在两个哲学家之间的“对话”“中演进的以及这一解释在哲学史上的意义.
The history of philosophy is not only history, but also puts it in a temporal horizon to see the historical relationship between the philosophical thought of the philosophers. When Heidegger elaborates on the history of analytic ontology The task seems to suggest an attitude towards the history of philosophy: to discard it according to the temporality of ontological discourse, and all that this attitude means is that he is evaluating Kant’s The meaning of “procrastination” used in existentialism.This article attempts to use Heidegger interpretation of Kant as a “case” in the controversial Kant of modern western philosophical history to explain the nature of this “hermeneutic violence” To discuss how philosophy evolved in Dialogue between two philosophers and the meaning of this interpretation in the history of philosophy.