论文部分内容阅读
目的研究某部新兵集训2个月时应激水平、情绪体验特点与情绪调节方式和认知偏向的关系。方法采用心理应激自评问卷(psychological stress self-evaluation test,PSET)、正性负性情感量表(positive and negative affect scale,PANAS)、情绪调节方式问卷(emotion regulation scale,ERS)和正性负性认知偏向量表(attention to positive and negative inventory scale,APNIS)对某部集训期新兵1 600人进行整群抽样调查。结果 1某部新兵心理应激T分为(50.04±10.00)。不同文化程度新兵心理应激水平差异有统计学意义(F=3.25,P<0.05)。2心理应激高分组在负性情绪、负性认知偏向和表达抑制上均显著高于心理应激低分组(P<0.01),在正性情绪、正性认知偏向和认知重评上显著低于低分组(P<0.01)。3总体心理应激水平与正性情绪、正性认知偏向和认知重评呈显著负相关(r值分别为-0.49、-0.32、-0.21,P<0.01);与负性情绪、负性认知偏向和表达抑制呈显著正相关(r值分别为0.48、0.34、0.12,P<0.01)。4正性情绪、负性情绪、负性认知偏向和正性认知偏向可有效预测心理应激水平,总解释率为37.6%。5认知重评在正性情绪与心理应激水平之间起调节作用。结论新兵的心理应激水平与情绪体验特点、情绪调节方式之间密切相关。
Objective To study the relationship between stress level, emotion experience characteristics and emotion regulation and cognitive bias at a training recruitment of 2 months. Methods The psychological stress self-evaluation test (PSET), positive and negative affect scale (PANAS), emotion regulation scale (ERS) and positive negative The attention to positive and negative inventory scale (APNIS) conducted a cluster sample survey of 1,600 recruits during a training session. Results 1 Recruiters psychological stress T divided into (50.04 ± 10.00). The psychological stress level of recruits with different educational level had statistical significance (F = 3.25, P <0.05). The scores of negative emotion, negative cognitive bias and expression inhibition were significantly higher in high stress group than in low stress group (P <0.01). Positive emotion, positive cognitive bias and cognitive reassessment Was significantly lower than the low group (P <0.01). The overall level of psychological stress was negatively correlated with positive emotion, positive cognitive bias and cognitive revaluation (r = -0.49, -0.32, -0.21, P <0.01, respectively) There was a significant positive correlation between the cognitive bias and expression inhibition (r = 0.48,0.34,0.12, P <0.01). 4 Positive emotions, negative emotions, negative cognitive bias and positive cognitive bias can effectively predict the level of psychological stress, the total explanation rate of 37.6%. Cognitive reevaluation plays a regulatory role between positive emotions and psychological stress. Conclusion The psychological stress level of recruits is closely related to the characteristics of emotional experience and emotional regulation.