论文部分内容阅读
周伦玲女士主张顾随《木兰花慢》(石头非宝玉)全篇赞美《红楼梦新证》,其父周汝昌先生一度认为全篇乃《恭王府考》题词。父女两说南辕北辙,互相矛盾。顾之京的“兼赞”说表明,顾词未必因《新证》而作。顾随两阕词中的两个“人英”非指同一人,聂绀弩也从没讲过“毛主席看了《新证》,有夸奖之语”。周文混淆了《新证》与顾词的文本事实,其全部辩解无法成立。总之,顾词属于题咏《红楼梦》之作,与《新证》毫无关联。
Ms. Zhou Lun Ling advocated following the “magnolia blossoms slow” (stone non-gem) full praise “new A Dream of Red Mansions,” his father, Mr. Zhou Ruchang once thought that the entire article is “Prince Gong House test” inscription. Father and daughter said two poles apart, contradictory. Gu’s Beijing’s “Complimenting” said that the Guci may not be due to “new card”. As the two men and women in the two terms, “Nie Ying” are not the same person, Nie Gan has never said anything about it. “Chairman Mao read the” new card “and he said there was a word of praise.” Zhou Wen confused the “new card” and the text of the text of the argument, the full justification can not be established. In short, Gu Ci belongs to the title of “Dream of the Red Chamber” for the work, and “new card” is not associated.