论文部分内容阅读
鲁迅作品一般比较艰深,学生不易理解,是中学语文教学的难点。是不是因此就只能由教师自己一讲到底,用不着去启发学生动脑筋思考呢?我校一位初三教师教《藤野先生》的实际,对此作了否定的回答。这位老师基本上采用了问答法来启发学生,引导学生分析理解课文。鉴于读一遍或听一遍,学生不一定能分析文章的层次结构,教师就在范读课文之前作了一点提示:本文主要写鲁迅在仙台和藤野先生的接触,那么到仙台之前他在什么地方学习和生活呢?后来怎么会离开仙台的呢?教师读完,紧接着让学生分层次,多数同学都举起了手,纷纷要求发言,结果多数同学都分析对了:第
Generally speaking, Lu Xun's works are rather difficult. Students are not easy to understand and it is a difficult point in middle school Chinese teaching. Is it therefore only by the teachers themselves in the end, do not need to inspire students to think about it? One of our school teachers teach “Mr. Fujino” the reality, to which a negative answer. The teacher basically adopted a question and answer method to inspire students and guide students to analyze and understand the text. In view of reading or listening again, the student may not be able to analyze the hierarchy of the article, the teacher made a point before reading the text: This article mainly deals with Lu Xun's contacts with Sendai and then where he studied before going to Sendai And life? Later, how would you leave Sendai? Teachers read, followed by the students at different levels, most of the students raised their hands, have asked to speak, the results of most of the students analyzed the right: