论文部分内容阅读
目的比较单用磺胺嘧啶银、单用湿润烧伤膏、汇涵术泰联合湿润烧伤膏在治疗深Ⅱ°烧伤创面时的疗效。方法选择我院72例成人深Ⅱ°烧伤患者,面积在15%~40%之间,随机分为治疗组、观察组及对照组各24例,治疗组选择汇涵术泰联合湿润烧伤膏治疗,观察组单用湿润烧伤膏,对照组单用磺胺嘧啶银,比较3组的创面愈合时间、止痛效果、创面感染情况及创区愈合后瘢痕形成情况。结果治疗组的创面愈合时间较观察组和对照组少(P<0.05),治疗组及观察组的创区止痛效果优于对照组(P<0.05),对照组创区瘢痕形成率较治疗组高(P<0.05),治疗组的细菌感染率低于观察组(P<0.05)。结论汇涵术泰联合湿润烧伤膏治疗深Ⅱ°烧伤创面优于单用湿润烧伤膏或磺胺嘧啶银。
Objective To compare the curative effects of silver sulfadiazine alone, MEBO alone, and MEBO combined with MEBO in the treatment of deep Ⅱ ° burn wounds. Methods Seventy-two patients with deep Ⅱ ° burn in our hospital from 15% to 40% were randomly divided into treatment group (24 cases) and observation group (24 cases). The treatment group was treated with MEBO combined with MEBO The observation group was treated with MEBO alone. The control group was treated with silver sulfadiazine alone. The wound healing time, analgesic effect, wound infection and scar formation were compared between the three groups. Results The wound healing time of the treatment group was less than that of the observation group and the control group (P <0.05). The wound healing of the treatment group and the observation group was better than that of the control group (P <0.05) (P <0.05). The bacterial infection rate in the treatment group was lower than that in the observation group (P <0.05). Conclusions The treatment of deep Ⅱ ° burn wounds with Huai Han Tai combined with MEBO is superior to MEBO or silver sulfadiazine alone.