论文部分内容阅读
这个选题的学术争鸣性是非常突出的,不仅仅在于这一选题的对象与内容(关于制度与人性方面的讨论历来都是思想家热衷的话题),而归于选题本身的提出,就存在着质疑。正如选题提出后,很多前期性问题都不容我们忽视:制度与人性能否具有可比性?这一命题是否是个伪问题?恶的定义应该是什么,是通常道德评判范畴还是其他?甚至这其中的一切评价标准是否合理?即使进行比较,是否能有最终明了、确定的答案?这些都提醒着我们不要跳进这个预设的陷阱。可我们却仍执著地跳了进去,纵然起跳的方式千姿百态。我们甚至希望更多的人与我们一起跳进去,将思考进行到底,我们都试图在思考中厘清这两者的关系(甚至可以微观到个体行为的取舍),来寻找个人生存的意义,重建社会治理的正当性。
The topic of academic contention is very prominent, not only in the subject and content of the topic (on the system and human nature of the discussion has always been a hot topic of thinkers), but due to the proposal itself, there is Questioning Just as the topics were put forward, many of the previous issues do not allow us to ignore whether there is comparability between the system and human nature. Is this proposition a pseudo-question, what should the definition of evil be, whether it is the usual category of moral judgment, or not? All evaluation criteria is reasonable? Even if compared to whether there is a final clear, definitive answer? These are to remind us not to jump into this default trap. But we are still persistently jumped into it, even though the way the take-off is mixed. We even hope that more people will jump in with us and think through to the end. We all try to clarify the relationship between the two in thinking (even micro-to individual trade-offs) to find the meaning of individual existence and rebuild society The legitimacy of governance.