论文部分内容阅读
为评价非接触式眼压计和Ｓｃｈφｔｚ氏眼压计对准分子激光角膜切削术后眼的眼压测量结果和价值，用准分子激光角膜切削术治疗正常眼压的近视患者６２例１２０只眼，术前用非接触式眼压计测量眼压，术后应用０．１％氟甲龙（Ｆｌｕｏｒｏｍｅｔｈｏｌｏｎｅ）点眼四周，术后一月复诊时，分别用非接触式眼压计和Ｓｃｈｉφｔｚ氏眼压计测量眼压。结果：术前眼压非接触式测量平均１６．６２±２．６１ｍｍＨｇ，术后眼压Ｓｃｈｉφｔｚ氏测量平均１８．７６±３．４３ｍｍＨｇ，非接触式测量平均１１．２９±２．８０ｍｍＨｇ，二者有显著差异性（Ｐ＜０．００１），术后异常眼压者Ｓｃｈｉφｔｚ氏检查发现２７例，非接触式眼压计未发现，对异常眼压的诊断有显著差异性（Ｐ＜０．００５）。结论：激光切削是导致术后两种测量方法结果差异的主要原因，使用非接触式眼压计进行准分子激光角膜切削术后眼压的测量并按传统正常值衡量是不准确的，否则会延误类固醇性青光眼的诊断。
To evaluate the intraocular pressure measurements and the value of non-contact tonometer and SchφT’s tonometer in patients who have been treated with molecular laser keratomileusis, 120 eyes of 62 eyes with normal intraocular pressure were treated with excimer laser keratomileusis , Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured preoperatively with a non-contact tonometer, postoperatively with Fluorometholone 0.1% for four weeks and non-contact tonometer and Schiφtz intraocular pressure Measurement of intraocular pressure. Results: The preoperative non-contact intraocular pressure non-contact measurement average 16.62 ± 2.61mmHg, postoperative intraocular pressure Schiφtz’s average of 18.76 ± 3.43mmHg, non-contact measurement of an average of 11.29 ± 2.80mmHg, both There were significant differences (P <0.001). There were 27 cases of abnormal intraocular pressure (IOP) by Schiφtz’s test, non-contact tonometer was not found, and the diagnosis of abnormal IOP was significantly different (P <0.005 ). CONCLUSIONS: Laser ablation is the main cause of postoperative differences between the results of the two measurement methods. It is inaccurate to measure intraocular pressure using a non-contact tonometer for excimer laser corneal incision, as measured by traditional normal values, otherwise Delayed steroid-induced glaucoma diagnosis.