论文部分内容阅读
再执行凭证是我国地方法院诉讼实践的创造,在《民事诉讼法》以及相关司法解释中并没有直接的规定。再执行凭证具有三大功能:证明债权债务关系存在、终结现行执行程序和中断执行时效。再执行凭证在司法实践中存在一些较为突出的问题,表现为片面追求执行结案率、缺乏统一性和浪费司法资源。完善再执行凭证制度,可以通过完善执行案件统计制度、执行期限和再执行期限、举证责任和登记管理四方面着手。
Re-execution of vouchers is the creation of litigation practice in the local courts in our country. There is no direct regulation in the Code of Civil Procedure and the relevant judicial interpretations. Re-implementation of vouchers has three major functions: to prove the existence of the relationship between claims and liabilities, the termination of the current implementation of the program and the suspension of the implementation of limitations. There are some prominent problems in the judicial practice in the implementation of vouchers, which are manifested in the one-sided pursuit of the implementation of the settlement rate, the lack of uniformity and the waste of judicial resources. Perfecting and implementing the voucher system can proceed from four aspects: perfecting the statistical system for the execution of the case, the time limit for execution and the period of re-execution, the burden of proof and the registration management.