论文部分内容阅读
本文针对一些中医辞典及中医教科书中反佐属于反治法之说,提出异议,认为此说未免混淆两个不同的概念。分析并论述了反佐与反治之区别。反佐是在治则立法确立之后,按照君臣佐使的关系,在组方中,对君药起制约作用,在处方中只是一个构件,居于次要地位。反佐较普遍见于组方之中,属组方结构,不能指导组方用药。反治属治疗原则,能指导组方用药,并且在病情严重或特殊情况下才应用。反治是对证而言,反佐却是对方剂而言。
This article raises objections to some anti-government theories in some Chinese medical dictionary and TCM textbooks, arguing that this confuses two different concepts. Analyzes and discusses the difference between anti-salvage and anti-governance. Anti-Sao was established after the establishment of the rule of rule, in accordance with the relations between monarchs and vassals, and in the group of parties, it played a restraining role for the king medicine, and was only a component in the prescription and was in a secondary position. Anti-Szoo is more commonly seen in the group, and it is a group structure that cannot guide the group to use drugs. Anti-treatment is a principle of treatment that can guide the use of prescription drugs and is only applied when the condition is severe or special. Anti-government is for the card, but anti-sac is for the other agent.