论文部分内容阅读
文学文体的演变犹如社会历史进程之变迁,虽有转型与激荡,但总体来看,既不可能断崖式崩塌,也不可能一蹴而就,而是基本呈现互为关联、互为肯否、互为扬弃的复杂代际更替运动过程。丁晓原的新著《行进中的现代性:晚清“五四”散文论》(中国社会科学出版社2016年版)对于两个时代散文的“关联研究”所秉持的理念和所给予我们的印象正是如此。作者以“现代性”为红线,将晚清与“五四”散文链接起来,阐述其中的同与异、断与续,侧重于探讨看似
The evolution of literary style is just like the change of the social and historical process. Although it is characterized by the transformation and agitation, on the whole, it is impossible for us to break through the precipice and impossible to do it overnight. Instead, we can basically present the interrelatedness, reciprocity and mutual rejection The process of complex intergenerational alternation movement. Ding Xiaoyuan’s New Book Modernity in Lateness: Late Qing ’s May 4th Literary Essay (China Social Sciences Press, 2016 edition) Our impression is that. The author uses “modernity ” as the red line, linking late Qing with the May Fourth prose, explaining the similarities and differences,