论文部分内容阅读
今年二月份,在上海出版的《文汇》月刊,刊登了《刘再复谈文学研究与文学论争》这是他在去年十二月间答覆该刊记者刘绪源的谈话记录.刘再复在他这篇长达一万四千多字的“对话录”中,用较多的篇幅谈到了关于姚雪垠对他的批评等具有敏感性的问题.据瞭解,刘再复的这次谈话是在当了一年“聋子”和“哑巴”之后的收获,以之奉献给广大读者;出于人们瞭解的原因以及刘氏的健康状况,这位中年理论家曾经整整沉默了一年.在这一年中间,他休养,他思考,他在一定范围内调查研究,一直没有对姚雪垠先生的正面批评进行答辩,如今这位以“文学主体论”和“性格组合论”等崭新观点名噪大陆文坛的中年理论家,向记者明确指出:“姚雪垠的批评
In February this year, the monthly ”Wenhui“ magazine published in Shanghai published the ”Liu to Discuss the Literary Research and Literary Controversy“ again in his reply to the journalist Liu Xuanyuan’s address in December last year. Over 14,000 words of Dialogues talked more about Yao’s sensitivity to his criticisms, etc. It is understood that this talk of Liu Zaifu was in the midst of one Year-old ”deaf“ and ”dumb“, dedication to the readers; the middle-aged theorists have been silent for a year for reasons of human understanding and Liu’s health During the middle of the year, he recuperated and he thought he was investigating and studying within a certain range. There has been no reply to the positive criticism of Mr. Yao Xueyin. Nowadays, this man has taken ”the theory of literary subject“ and ”personality combination theory“ ”A New View of Famous Chinese Literary Middle Age Theorists clearly pointed out to reporters: " Yao Xueyin criticism