论文部分内容阅读
公益性公司主要是指垄断性公司和独占资源性公司,包括大部分央企和部分金融机构。我们提出一个概念是公益性公司,与一般的公司宗旨有所不同。一般的公司宗旨明确宣布自己是一个营利性的企业,自负盈亏,他人不要干涉;只要不做违法的事情,他人干涉也没有用。企图用社会责任约束公司行为是一个想当然的行为,多数情况只能是鼓吹者落得自弹自唱;而公司该干什么还是干什么,并不理会社会的呼吁。人们在失望之余会找法律向公司讨个说法,但发现公司法并没有明确规定公司社会责任的范围,也没有规定公司社会责任的大小,只是笼统地提及公司应当承担社会责任;呼吁者企图用这些笼统的规定要求公司承担社会责任的想法,与天桥上摆个空罐子等路人丢钱的想法差不多。因此,要想让公司承担社会责任需有法律依据。
Non-profit corporations mainly refer to monopoly companies and exclusive resource companies, including most of the central enterprises and some financial institutions. We propose a concept is a public welfare company, and the general purpose of the company is different. The general purpose of the company clearly declares itself to be a for-profit enterprise, self-financing, others do not interfere; as long as not to do illegal acts, others interfere with no use. It is a matter of course that attempts to restrain company behavior with social responsibility are taken for granted. In most cases, the advocate can only be self-styled. What the company does or does not pay attention to the appeal of society. While disappointed, people find a law to discuss with the company, but found that the company law does not clearly define the scope of corporate social responsibility, nor does it stipulate the size of corporate social responsibility. It simply refers to the company should assume social responsibility. The appellant Attempts to use these general rules to require companies to assume social responsibility are about the same as losing money to passers-by such as empty cans on the flyover. Therefore, in order to allow the company to assume social responsibility must have legal basis.