论文部分内容阅读
从郭沫若对秦始皇的批判中可以看出 ,他对专制独裁制度极为憎恶。但是 ,郭沫若的批判都是道德的角度 ,局限于道德层面。郭沫若一生热衷于政治 ,但那正是中国儒家知识分子的传统。他毕竟没有成为政治家 ,他观察政治的角度和立场仍是知识分子的角度和立场。而政治家尤其中国政治家更为关注社会的统一和稳定。儒法两家维护君主专制的目的完全一致 ,只是学说的理论根据和政治策略不同。中国几千年的政治一直都是内法而外孔。
As can be seen from Guo Mo-ru’s criticism of Qin Shi Huang, he is extremely abhorrent to the autocratic dictatorship. However, Guo’s criticism is both a moral one and a moral one. Kuo Mo-jo was passionate about politics throughout his life, but that was the tradition of Chinese Confucian intellectuals. After all, he did not become a politician. His observation of political positions and positions remains the intellectual’s standpoint. Politicians, especially Chinese politicians, pay more attention to social unity and stability. The two Confucianism and Legal Purposes maintain the absolute monarchy exactly the same purpose, only the theoretical basis of the doctrine and political strategies are different. Thousands of years of Chinese politics have always been internal laws and externalities.