论文部分内容阅读
与传统理性主义科学观和非理性主义科学观相比,科学修辞语境中的辩证理性科学观为我们提供了一种更为符合科学实践同时也更富有前途的指向,因为与传统理性主义科学观不同,它并不是与一个特性或一组已确立的必要条件相联系,而是与自由争论的不同特性和语境条件相联系;同时与“怎么都行”的“非理性”相比,辩证理性更加适当,因为它并不取决于权威的心理冲动或外在的社会因素,而是权衡于科学修辞语境中的实体性和程序性因素;此外,它还克服了早期那些朴素辩证法单一、步骤化的缺陷,使其在多变的科学修辞语境中更好地彰显其丰富性和应变性。
Compared with the traditional science of science and the science of science of irrationality, the science of dialectical science in the rhetorical context of science provides us with a more consistent and scientific future as well as a promising future because, unlike the traditional rationalist science It is not related to a feature or a group of established necessary conditions but to different features and contextual conditions of free debate; at the same time, it is not related to "irrationality Dialectical rationality is more appropriate than dialectical reason because it does not depend on the mental impulses of authority or external social factors but on the substantive and procedural factors that are weighed against the rhetoric of science; in addition, it overcame the earlier The simple and dialectical shortcomings of simple dialectics make it better manifest its richness and adaptability in the changing rhetorical context of science.