论文部分内容阅读
口语测试方法主要有一对一访问模式和群测模式。而群测模式因为其更接近真实谈话场景,并且更经济省时而被规模大、参考人数多的口语考试所采纳。同时,口语群测模式的效度也受到广大研究者的关注。本文主要关注考生间的熟识性对口语群测模式中考生的成绩可能产生的影响。参与这次研究的31位学生来自同一所大学的三所不同学院。学院间的学生彼此陌生,但同一学院的学生同时也是同班同学。31位同学三人为一组,组成十组,分别参加两次口语群测考试(两次群测考试均有一位同学缺席,所以两次群测考试有一组为二人)。第一次口语考试中,同组有两人熟识,一人陌生;第二次口语考试中,同组三人彼此均不认识。考试模式采纳大学英语四六级口语考试模式。第二次考试后每位考生填写了相关问卷。考试结果经multi-faceted Rasch measurement分析后发现,考生间熟识性对考生的成绩有正面影响。但考生在问卷回答中就此课题持不同意见。
Oral test methods are mainly one to one access mode and group measurement mode. The group test mode is adopted because it is closer to the real conversation scene and more economical and time-saving than the large-scale and reference population of oral exams. At the same time, the validity of the spoken language test model has also attracted the attention of researchers. This article focuses on the possible influence of the familiarity among the candidates on the performance of the oral test in the oral test. The 31 students participating in the study came from three different colleges in the same university. Inter-college students are strangers to each other, but students from the same college are also classmates. 31 students of three as a group, composed of ten groups, respectively, to participate in two spoken language group test (two group test test have a classmate absent, so two group test a group of two). In the first oral exam, two people in the same group were familiar with one another; in the second oral exam, the same three people did not know each other. Exam Mode Adoption of the College English forty-six oral exam mode. After the second exam each candidate filled out the relevant questionnaire. Test results by multi-faceted Rasch measurement analysis found that among the candidates familiarity has a positive impact on the performance of candidates. However, the candidates in the questionnaire to answer different questions on this issue.