论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨不同超声影像学检查技术在妇产科急腹症临床诊断中的应用效果。方法:选择罗定市妇幼保健院妇科2015年1月至2016年12月收治的108例急腹症患者的临床资料作为研究对象,按超声诊断方式的不同分为两组。所有患者均进行临床病理诊断,并以此作为对照标准,观察组患者采用经阴道超声进行诊断,而对照组患者则采用经腹部超声进行诊断,观察不同超声影像学检查技术对妇产科急腹症的诊断符合率。结果:观察组患者经阴道超声诊断符合51例,诊断符合率高达92.73%,而对照组患者经腹部超声诊断符合39例,诊断符合率仅为73.58%,经阴道超声诊断符合率更高,两者对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:超声影像学检查技术对妇产科急腹症具有一定的诊断意义,并且经阴道超声诊断结果显著优于经腹部超声。
Objective: To explore the application of different ultrasonic imaging techniques in the clinical diagnosis of acute abdomen obstetrics and gynecology. Methods: The clinical data of 108 patients with acute abdomen admitted from January 2015 to December 2016 in gynecology department of Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Luoding were selected as the research object. The patients were divided into two groups according to the different ultrasonic diagnostic methods. All patients were clinically and pathologically diagnosed, and as a control standard, the observation group of patients with transvaginal ultrasound diagnosis, while the control group of patients were diagnosed by trans-abdominal ultrasound, observation of different ultrasound imaging of obstetrics and gynecology acute abdomen Syndrome diagnosis coincidence rate. Results: The transvaginal sonography in the observation group was consistent with that of 51 cases, and the diagnostic coincidence rate was 92.73%. The control group was diagnosed by abdominal ultrasonography in 39 cases, the diagnostic coincidence rate was only 73.58%, and the coincidence rate was higher in transvaginal ultrasound. In contrast, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Ultrasound imaging technique has some diagnostic significance for acute abdomen obstetrics and gynecology, and transvaginal ultrasonography is superior to transabdominal ultrasonography.