Benefits of standing at work

来源 :中华物理医学与康复杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:qqanjun
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Sedentary behaviors have been associated with an increased risk of chronic disease and mortality. As office workers spend 70 to 85% of their time sitting, this study assessed the effect of a program designed to decrease sitting time at work.

METHODS

Eligible subjects were office workers, 18 to 70 years of age, who spent at least 75% of their working day in a seated position. The participants were randomized at the office group level. Those in the intervention group received SMArT work intervention, including a height adjustable desk and education concerning the consequences of sitting. An electronic cushion provided feedback by vibration regarding sitting time. The control group were not given lifestyle advice, guidance or modified work stations.

The primary outcome measure was change in occupational sitting time, as assessed by an ergometer. Secondary outcomes included physical activity, musculoskeletal health, work-related measures and measures of cognition, mood, and quality of life. The subjects were assessed at baseline and at three, six-and 12-months′ follow-ups.

RESULTS

At 12-month follow-up, compared to controls, the intervention group had a reduction in sit time of 83.28 minutes per work day, with prolonged sitting time reduced by 44.93 minutes per work day. At 12 months, the intervention group obtained significantly better scores in job performance and recovery from occupational fatigue, but not in job satisfaction. The intervention group also earned better scores in time management and mentalinterpersonal demands than did the control group. The intervention group also demonstrated better scores on the Stroop Color Word Test-Reaction Time, quality of life and anxiety. No significant difference was found between groups in musculoskeletal complaints.

CONCLUSION

This randomized, controlled study of office workers found that an intervention strategy designed to reduce sitting time can reduce sitting time and improve job performance, working engagement, occupational fatigue, anxiety and quality of life.

其他文献
目的研究内镜超声检查术(EUS)辅助诊断早期肝硬化的价值,以及分析EUS联合肝脏病理(LH)和肝硬度(LSM)对早期肝硬化的诊断效能。方法收集天津市人民医院226例存在慢性肝损伤行内镜检查和EUS的患者资料,评估食管和胃底静脉曲张情况,行LH检查明确肝纤维化情况,行Fibroscan检查明确LSM。分别构建EUS-LSM 、EUS-LH、LSM-LH和ELL(EUS,LSM和LH)肝硬化预测模型,
目的探究导丝引导法在经皮经肝胆管穿刺引流术(PTBD)的可行性和安全性。方法回顾性分析2011年1月至2017年12月因胆道疾病在黑龙江省医院行PTBD治疗的174例患者资料,其中85例为常规步骤操作(常规组),89例在胆管穿刺成功后不注入造影剂,先借助导丝引导穿刺针外套管进入胆管深部,抽取胆汁充分减压后再造影(导丝引导组),比较两种方法的成功率及术后PTBD相关胆管炎发生率。结果导丝引导组与常规
目的探讨超细内镜辅助肠道金属支架置入治疗结直肠癌合并急性肠梗阻的临床疗效。方法对56例结直肠癌合并急性肠梗阻患者行超细内镜辅助下置入国产肠道金属支架治疗,观察治疗效果。结果56例患者中直肠癌11例,乙状结肠癌18例,降结肠癌13例,横结肠癌9例,升结肠和(或)回盲部癌5例。肠道支架成功置入52例(92.9%),支架置入手术时间30~90 min,无穿孔、出血、感染及心肺功能意外等并发症。24~48
目的通过对猪肝脏、胰腺行内镜超声引导下微波消融术后的机体生理状态及局部病理改变的观察,探讨微波消融术的可行性与安全性。方法以健康小型猪8头为实验对象。全麻后插入内镜超声,在胃内扫查定位肝脏、胰腺,经内镜超声钳道插入直径1.9 mm微波消融针消融肝脏和胰腺。肝脏消融功率设置为65 W,时间10 min;胰腺消融功率设置为60 W,时间5 min。术前及术后检测肝转氨酶、血清淀粉酶生化指标,并于术后当
目的探讨结直肠近端锯齿状息肉的检出情况并筛选其危险因素。方法纳入2016年9月至2017年9月香港大学深圳医院内镜中心22位医师完成的9 010例结肠镜检查病例资料,计算腺瘤检出率(ADR)和近端锯齿状息肉检出率(PSDR),并使用Pearson相关系数评估两者的相关性,利用logistic回归分析对比不同医师的PSDR。结果22位医师的全部受检者平均ADR为30.07%(20.00%~40.78
目的评估内镜下空肠管置入术、钛夹夹闭术及耙状金属夹系统(OTSC)对消化道瘘治疗的应用价值。方法回顾性分析2015年7月至2017年7月苏州大学附属第一医院收治的38例消化道瘘患者资料,其中单纯行内镜下空肠管置入术(空肠管组)13例,行内镜下钛夹夹闭术(钛夹组)20例,OTSC闭合(OTSC组)5例。对患者的技术成功率、临床治愈率及术后住院时间进行统计分析。结果所有患者顺利完成了内镜下治疗,治疗过
目的评价醋酸染色联合窄带光成像在早期胃癌及癌前病变诊断中的价值。方法2015年11月至2017年11月在上海市浦东新区光明中医医院胃镜检查怀疑胃癌和癌前病变的132例患者136个病灶,分别依次用单一窄带光成像(窄带光成像组)、单一醋酸染色(醋染组)、醋酸染色联合窄带光成像(联合组)观察病灶内镜图像清晰度、微腺管表型、微血管表型、病灶分界线和黏膜变白至恢复正常的时间(白化时间),分析不同方法诊断胃癌
目的观察心脏康复干预对冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后患者生活质量及心功能的影响。方法选取2016年1月至12月期间在我院行PCI手术的140例冠心病患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为观察组及对照组。对照组于PCI术后给予常规护理干预,观察组在此基础上辅以心脏康复训练,共持续干预3个月。于入选时、干预3个月分别采用生活质量评价量表SF-36(SF-36)、6分钟步行试验(6-MWT
目的编制脑卒中症状体验量表,并进行信效度检验。方法经文献回顾、现有脑卒中相关量表和患者访谈,拟定初版症状条目池。通过专家咨询进行条目的增删和修改,预调查,对患者不理解项目进行补充说明,确定初版症状体验量表。对上海市两家医院康复科的200名脑卒中患者进行问卷调查,应用SPSS 22.0版软件对数据进行处理和分析,评价量表的信效度。结果脑卒中症状体验量表包括19个条目,经探索性因子分析提取6个公因子,
目的观察超短波联合高压氧治疗股骨头坏死的疗效。方法选取符合入选和排除标准的股骨头坏死患者64例,采用随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组,每组患者32例。2组患者均给予常规改善循环药物静脉滴注,治疗组在此基础上加用超短波和高压氧治疗。超短波和高压氧治疗均每日1次,20次为1个疗程,共治疗2个疗程。于治疗前和治疗2个疗程后(治疗后)采用髋关节Harris评分对2组患者进行疗效评定。结果治疗后,2组患者的H