论文部分内容阅读
澳大利亚国家文化多元化,课程设置在结构和内容上均有独特之处,维多利亚的文化教育历来比较发达,代表了澳大利亚教育发展的状况。维多利亚州英语标准写作部分从文本、情境性理解、语言结构和特征、策略四个部分提出具体的指标。其中写作策略作为一项重要的指标纳入到课程标准中来,而我国《语文课程标准》在写作部分并没有划分出核心的写作策略板块。这导致我国语文课程标准对语文教学缺乏相应具体的科学指导。因此,本文拟对澳大利亚维多利亚州《课程与标准框架》第二版(Curriculum and Standards Framework II)CSF I(I英语)中的小学写作标准和我国《义务教育语文课程标准(2011年版)》小学写作标准的策略领域予以比较和分析,将对我国语文写作策略教学具有重要的借鉴意义。一、澳大利亚(英语)小学写作标准下策略领域的具体内
Australia’s national cultural diversity and curriculum are unique in structure and content. The cultural education in Victoria has always been rather developed and represents the development of Australian education. Victoria English standard writing part from the text, situational understanding, language structure and characteristics, strategy, four parts of the specific indicators. Among them, the writing strategy is included as an important index into the curriculum standards. However, the core part of the writing strategy is not defined in the writing part of the “Chinese Curriculum Standards” in our country. This led to the Chinese language curriculum standards for the lack of appropriate specific scientific guidance of Chinese teaching. Therefore, this article intends to discuss the primary school writing standard of Curriculum and Standards Framework II CSF I (I English) and the elementary school writing of China Compulsory Education Language Curriculum Standard (2011 Edition) The comparison and analysis of the standard strategy fields will be of great reference significance to our country’s Chinese writing strategy teaching. First, the Australian (English) primary school writing standards under the specific areas of strategy