论文部分内容阅读
所谓“非是”,即“不是什么”。本文题旨所在,是要对那些与编辑学理论研究相悖的形式与方法进行一番检视与思考。 三年前,笔者曾为《编辑之友》杂志草拟过一则《征稿启事》,登载在1991年第6期上,其中有这样几句话,“编辑学理论研究已走过了它的草创时期,目前,若想最终建立起这门学科的大厦,似应注重于从具体的、微观的角度入手做深入细致的研究工作。对于仍然将论题停留在诸如有学无学、有多少分支学科、如何研究这门学科之类的只打外围不攻坚层次的文章,本刊将敬而远之。”“论文,应当‘论’、应当‘证’,而忌‘议’。”现在再来翻检这段文字,这只是笔者当时在读稿
The so-called “non-is”, that is, “not what.” The purpose of this paper is to review and think about the forms and methods that are incompatible with the study of editorial theory. Three years ago, the author once drafted a Call for Contribution for Friends of Editors, published in Issue 6 of 1991. Among them, there is such a few words: “The study of editorialist theory has gone through its grassroots Period, at present, if we finally want to establish the building of this discipline, we should focus on the specific and micro perspectives to do in-depth and meticulous research.For the topics still remain in such as learning without learning, how many branches , How to study such subjects as the outer edge of the non-strenuous article, the journal will be at arm’s length. ”“ Papers, should be ’theory’, should be ’card’, and avoid ’discussion.’ ”Now flip the text again This is only the author was reading