论文部分内容阅读
比较是作为手段,其目的在于汇通。本文意欲运用文学文体学的方法,通过比较中英具有代表性的学者小说——钱锺书之《围城》与戴维·洛奇之《小世界——学者浪漫传奇》说明它们在结构上都使用追寻为主题,借用巧合和冲突很好地反映小说的隐含意义;阐释虽然地域不同、文化不同、思维习惯不同,但两位作家都借学者这一小天地反映出人性,因而具有普世价值。《围城》与《小世界》可比较之依据中国在这方面兼得的学者当属钱锺书先生,其小说《围
Comparison is as a means, the purpose is to Huitong. This article intends to use the method of literary stylistics to compare the representative scholarly novels of China and Britain - Qianzhong’s Fortress Besieged and David Lodge’s “Little World - Scholarly Romance” to illustrate that both of them are structurally The use of pursuit as the theme, the use of coincidence and conflict, a good reflection of the novel’s implicit meaning; interpretation of different geographical, cultural and thinking habits are different, but both writers are borrowed scholars to reflect this small world of human nature, which has universal value . Comparison between “Besieged City” and “Little World” Based on the fact that China has both scholars in this field as Mr. Qian Zhongshu,