论文部分内容阅读
适逢我国所有制改革的特定历史时期,西方产权理论一经介绍传入我国,便很快引起了学术界的极大兴趣和关注。但是由于种种原因,在借鉴的过程中,人们对西方产权理论也存在着诸多的误解,例如,颇具代表性的一种观点认为,产权理论的中心议题就是“强调明确界定的私人产权和自由议定契约的权力足以解决一切复杂的经济效率问题”,①在此基础上,不少人进一步把我国的所有制改革简单地归结为界定产权和实现产权明晰化,还有的人则从中看到了私有化的倾向而加以抵制和反对。②事实上,产权理论尽管非常强调明确界定
At a particular historic period of the reform of ownership in our country, the theory of property rights in the West, once introduced into our country, soon aroused great interest and concern from the academic community. However, due to various reasons, there are many misunderstandings in the theory of property rights in the West. For example, a rather representative view holds that the central topic of property rights theory is to “emphasize clearly defined private property rights and freedom The power of the contract is sufficient to solve all the complicated economic efficiency problems. ”On this basis, many people further simplified the ownership reform in our country into defining property rights and realizing property rights clarification. Others saw that privatization To resist and oppose. In fact, although the theory of property rights places great emphasis on the definition of property rights