论文部分内容阅读
以我国图书情报领域11种期刊为例,调查其论文OA情况,分析OA论文与非OA论文的平均被引次数是否存在统计学意义上的显著差异。研究结果表明:我国LIS领域OA比例较高,但第三方存储所占比重较大;我国LIS领域期刊OA论文比非OA论文拥有更高的平均被引次数,且具有统计学意义,即存在OA引用优势,同时OA引用优势更多是一种通则性解释而非所有个案都适用。本文认为该OA引用优势可以通过资源获取的便捷性予以解释。本文的研究为当前国内学术期刊OA化提供了一个可能的理论支持。
Take the 11 journals in the field of library and information science as an example, we investigate the OA situation of OA papers and analyze whether there is a significant difference in the average number of citations of OA papers and non-OA papers. The results show that: the proportion of OA in LIS field is higher in our country, but the proportion of third-party storage is larger; OA papers in periodical LIS in China have higher average number of citations than non-OA papers, and there is statistical significance Citing the advantages, while the advantages of OA references more of a general explanation rather than all cases are applicable. This paper argues that the advantages of this OA reference can be explained by the ease of access to resources. The research in this paper provides a possible theoretical support for the current OA academicization in China.