论文部分内容阅读
到底该如何对待民营企业的“原罪”,目前各种观点莫衷一是,各有道理。有观点认为,大多数民营企业家非但没有“原罪”,甚至还有“原功”,他们推动了社会经济的发展,走在了改革的前沿;也有人认为,有罪就是有罪,一些当初不守法的民营企业家即使为社会经济作出了再大的贡献,也是天网恢恢。但是,“原罪”一词到底该如何理解,有罪和无罪之间的红线应如何划定,却没有争论出一个令社会信服的结果。判定有罪还是无罪是司法机关的事情,我们也应当相信司法机关的鉴别能力和政治智慧,毕竟他们是以法律为准绳办事的,并享有最终解释权。其实,讨论“原罪”的核心并不是一个“罪”字,而是呼唤一种公平和透明。正如本文作者所说:我并不想为这些富豪们叫屈,而是这些事情的发生总是让人不平。
In the end how to deal with the “original sin” of private-owned enterprises, at present there is no consistent view of all kinds and each makes sense. Some people think that most non-state-owned entrepreneurs do not have “original sin” or even “original work”. They have promoted social and economic development and are at the forefront of reform. Some people think that guilty is guilty and some did not abide by the law Of private entrepreneurs even for the social economy has made a significant contribution, but also Skynet recovery. However, how the word “original sin” should be understood, how the red line between guilt and innocence should be delineated, has not been debated as a result of social conviction. It is a matter for the judiciary to decide whether to be guilty or not, and we should also believe in the ability of the judiciary to identify and political wisdom. After all, they act according to the law and have the ultimate power of interpretation. In fact, it is not a “sin” to discuss the core of “original sin”, but to call for a fair and transparent. As the author of this article said: I do not want to cry for these rich, but these things always make people uneasy.