论文部分内容阅读
目的:检验特拉华欺负受害量表(学生卷)(DBVS-S)中文版在中国青少年中的信度和效度。方法:应用中文版DBVS-S对湖南省4个地区10所学校小学六年级至高三2443名学生施测,以流调中心抑郁量表(CES-D)、学生生活满意度量表(SLSS)和Olweus儿童欺负问卷(BVQ)为效标,测评效标关联效度,随机抽取其中2个班计117名被试间隔4周后重测。结果:1DBVS-S中文版维度结构与原量表一致,探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析均支持三因子结构模型;2DVBS-S中文版总分与CES-D和BVQ的相关系数分别为0.360和0.766(P<0.001),与SLSS的相关系数为-0.184(P<0.001);3总量表α系数为0.839,4周后的重测相关系数为0.684。结论:特拉华欺负受害量表(学生卷)中文版具有较好的信效度。
Aims: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese edition of the Delaware Bullying Scale for Deception (Student Vol.) (DBVS-S) in Chinese adolescents. Methods: The Chinese version of DBVS-S was used to test 2443 pupils from grade 6 to grade 3 in 10 schools in 4 districts in Hunan Province. The questionnaire was collected by using Depression Rating Scale (CES-D), Student Life Satisfaction Scale (SLSS) and Olweus Child Bullying Questionnaire (BVQ) as a criterion, the validity of the test criterion, 117 randomly selected 2 classes of test subjects were retested after an interval of 4 weeks. Results: The Chinese version of 1DBVS-S has the same dimension structure as the original scale. Both exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis support the three-factor structural model. The correlation coefficients of the 2DVBS-S Chinese version with CES-D and BVQ are 0.360 And 0.766 (P <0.001), respectively. The correlation coefficient with SLSS was -0.184 (P <0.001). The α coefficient of 3 total scale was 0.839, and the retest correlation coefficient was 0.684 after 4 weeks. Conclusion: The Delaware Bullying Bullying Scale (Student Volume) Chinese version has good reliability and validity.