论文部分内容阅读
一部影片有三个不同的结尾,在电影史上是空前的,这当然是创新。如果“新”仅仅是为了猎奇、变戏法、耍技巧,甚至捉弄观众,那就分文不值。正如美国导演罗本·马摩里安所说:“创新如果没有目的,那就是无聊的事情。”那么,《小街》结尾的创新,怎么样呢?(不难看出,它是既有着生活的可信性,又有着鲜明的艺术目的的。正如导演所说:为了“寻找银幕和观众之间的新联系”,是有意地让三个结尾留给观众某些“遗憾”,从而“使他们根据自身的生活经历,创作一个认为满意的结尾,借此加深影片的广度和深度的”(见杨延晋:《为<小街>复陈荒煤同志》)。电影既然是一种观众积极参加剧情的艺术,如果影片能触发观众的联想,拨动观众的心弦,能把主人公的生活同观众自己的生活加以联系、对照,那么,发人深省、催我自新的目的就定能达到,影片的广度和深度也一定能够得到加深。同时,观众的审美情趣,
There are three different endings of a film, which is unprecedented in the history of cinema, which of course is innovative. If the “new” is only for the sake of curiosity, tricks, tricks, or even teasing the audience, it is worth nothing. As American director Robben Mamorian put it, “If innovation has no purpose, that’s boring things.” So what about innovation at the end of “Street?” (It’s easy to see that it’s both life Credibility, and a distinct artistic purpose, as the director said: “To” find a new connection between the screen and the audience “is to intentionally leave the three ends with some” regret “to the audience and” make them According to his own life experiences, create a conclusion that is deemed satisfactory, so as to deepen the breadth and depth of the film. “(See Yang Yanjin:” Comrade Chen Shui Chang Comrades "). Since the film is an art of actively participating in the plot If the film can trigger the association of viewers, dial the heartstrings of the audience, and can relate the life of the protagonist to the audience’s own life. In contrast, the thought-provoking purpose of urging my self-reliance can be achieved. The breadth and depth of the film It will certainly be able to get deeper.At the same time, the audience’s aesthetic taste,