论文部分内容阅读
戏剧评论,亦算一家。但实际上,各地均无专业队伍。有些地方,写了不少戏剧评论文章的人,常被视作局外人,而不能参加剧协分会。故咸自嘲为“散兵游勇”,喻其无“家”可归者也。若说能称之为“戏剧评论家”的为数不多,也不尽然。笔者曾参加过一次某地剧协分会选举理事的会议。候选名单上,林林总总,“戏剧评论家”几近三分之一。惊讶之余,方探悉原来所谓“戏剧评论家”者。实则都是局长、处长、科长或主任之类。剧协是个群众团体,理事更需在业务上有所专长并有所建树者。“表演艺术家”是要粉墨登场的,不敢贸然称之。“剧作家”也是要有作品的,也不敢冒昧地滥竽充数。唯独这“戏剧评论家”,灵活性最大。能写出评论文章,固然可以成家。从未动过翰墨的,也未尝不可成其为“家”。在文化部门工作,戏总是要看
Drama reviews, also count one. But in fact, there are no professional teams from all over. In some places, people who have written many dramatic commentary articles are often regarded as outsiders and can not participate in dramas chapters. Therefore, salty self-deprecating as “scattered soldiers and valiant”, Yu no “home” can also be returned. If we can call it “theatrical critic” one of the few, but not always. The author once participated in a local dramatists Association elected members of the meeting. On the list of candidates, there are numerous, almost a third of the “theater critics.” Surprised, the party to explore the original so-called “dramatic critic” who. In fact, the director, director, section chief or director of the class. Drama Association is a mass group, directors need to have expertise in business and make contributions. “Performing artists” is to appear on stage, not rashly call it. “Playwright” also want to have a work, do not dare to take the liberty to pretend. Only this “theater critic”, the most flexible. Can write a review article, of course, can be married. Never touch the ink, nor can it be as “home.” Work in the cultural sector, the show always depends on