论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察中西医结合治疗结肠癌合并2型糖尿病的临床疗效。方法:按随机数字表法将符合标准的84例患者分为观察组43例和对照组41例,观察组采用中西医结合治疗,对照组采用西医治疗。观察2组并发症发生情况和卡氏评分变化情况。结果:观察组显效率65.12%,总有效率88.37%;对照组显效率39.02%,总有效率68.29%。2组比较,总有效率差异无显著性意义(P>0.05),但显效率差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后发生并发症3例,总发生率6.98%。对照组术后发生并发症11例,总发生率26.83%。2组术后并发症总发生率比较,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论:中西医结合治疗结肠癌合并2型糖尿病,改善患者卡氏评分与减少术后并发症的疗效均优于单纯西药治疗。
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and colon cancer. Methods: According to the random number table method, 84 patients meeting the standard were divided into observation group (43 cases) and control group (41 cases). The observation group was treated with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine. The control group was treated with western medicine. The incidence of complications and the changes of Karnofsky scores were observed. Results: In the observation group, the effective rate was 65.12% and the total effective rate was 88.37%. In the control group, the effective rate was 39.02% and the total effective rate was 68.29%. There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between two groups (P> 0.05), but the significant difference was significant (P <0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 3 cases, with a total incidence of 6.98%. The control group had 11 cases of postoperative complications, the total incidence was 26.83%. The total incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups was significantly different (P <0.05). Conclusion: Integrative treatment of colon cancer with type 2 diabetes, improve patient Karnofsky score and reduce postoperative complications are superior to the efficacy of Western medicine alone.