论文部分内容阅读
文章通过将黑格尔《逻辑学》中的体系性和方法性分别对待的做法,表明了其观念论的一面和方法论的一面的各自特点。对马克思来说,虽然黑格尔的泛逻辑主义本体论并不可取,但其《逻辑学》,尤其是“本质论”这部分所蕴涵的方法论却极其重要,它直接影响到《政治经济学批判(手稿)》和后来的《资本论》,是它们的方法论基础。文章从五个关键词出发,表明马克思对黑格尔方法论的这种吸收利用。但与此同时,马克思对黑格尔哲学作了一种转换:他对五个关键词都作了新的理解,特别是用劳动取代了精神作为对象的本质性概念,将有机的、动力学的观念论转换为一种唯物论——马克思用“本质论”的方法论批判了19世纪的政治经济学和黑格尔哲学本身,同时他又在著作中延续着这种来自黑格尔的传统。
Through the systematic and methodological treatment of Hegel’s Logics, the article shows the characteristics of its conceptualism and methodological aspects. For Marx, although Hegel’s pan-logicist ontology is not desirable, the methodology of “logic”, especially “intrinsic theory”, is extremely important. It directly affects the “politics The critique of economics (Manuscripts) and later The Theory of Capital are the foundations of their methodology. Starting from the five key words, the article shows Marx’s absorption and utilization of Hegel’s methodology. At the same time, however, Marx made a change in Hegel’s philosophy: he made a new understanding of each of the five key words. In particular, he replaced the essential concept of using the labor as the object, combining organic, kinetic Is transformed into a kind of materialism - Marx criticized the nineteenth-century political economy and Hegel’s philosophy itself with the methodology of ”essential theory ", and at the same time, he continued this work from Hegel tradition of.