论文部分内容阅读
施拉普纳带领中国队的失败,是中国足坛的一个转折点。 中国足球刚刚打开的走向国际化的大门又变得“半遮半掩”,在使用外籍教练时显得小心翼翼,甚至患得患失,这才是那次失败令人最痛心疾首之处。之后国奥队的拉德形同虚设,广州松日队的维尔纳中途被废……中国似乎成了外籍教练的“百慕大”,而且众口一词的理由就是不了解中国国情。 如今中国队兵败十强赛,足球界再一次陷入和1992年时一样的讨论,中国该不该聘请外籍教练?我认为,只要清醒地认识到中国足球和世界足球的差距,这就不是一个难解的学术难题。 为何要请外籍教练 清末时魏源曾提出:“师夷长技
Schlappner led the Chinese team’s failure is a turning point in Chinese football. Chinese football has just opened the door to internationalization has become “half-covered”, the use of foreign coaches look cautious, or even the outcome of the loss, this is the failure of the most painful place. After the Olympic team’s Ladd useless, Guangzhou Songri team Werner halfway was scrapped ... China seems to have become a foreign coach “Bermuda”, and the reason for the word out of mouth is not aware of China’s national conditions. Now the Chinese team defeat defeat ten games, football once again fall into the same discussion and in 1992, China should not hire foreign coaches? I think, as long as the sober understanding of the gap between Chinese football and the world of football, this is not a Difficult academic problems. Why should we invite foreign coaches Wei Yuan once made during the late Qing Dynasty: