论文部分内容阅读
文章通过分析当前全国各地方农村集体建设用地使用权流转试点工作以及制定的相关地方性规章、办法,对比我国《宪法》、《土地管理法》中对集体建设用地使用权的规定,看出二者之间早已形成了巨大的鸿沟与冲突。在社会经济规律的作用下,现实中的集体建设用地使用权流转行为,已经越来越多地得到全国各地许多地方政府的响应,在民间也因此获得了应有的肯定。但是作为规定该权利和行为的具有权威地位的《土地管理法》,却迟迟不肯松口。文章试图通过分析权利流转的现状及其产生的负外部性,来剖析立法所面临的困境。
Through the analysis of the pilot projects on the transfer of the right to use rural collective construction land all over the country and the relevant local rules and regulations, the article compares the provisions of the Constitution and the Land Administration Law on the right to use collective construction land, There has long been a huge gap and conflict between the two. Under the influence of social and economic laws, the transfer of the usufruct of collective construction land in reality has increasingly been echoed by many local governments in various parts of the country, and so it has been affirmed by the people. However, as an authoritative “land management law” that stipulates this right and behavior, it has been too slow to refuse. The article attempts to analyze the dilemmas faced by legislation by analyzing the status quo of the right transfer and its negative externality.